VOLLEY WEEK

Wave of reactions after the drama with Germany: Fans believe in the team, but ask Blengini "why?"

VolleyWeek

VolleyWeek

September 19, 2026 at 23:46

Add to Preferred Sources
Wave of reactions after the drama with Germany: Fans believe in the team, but ask Blengini "why?"

A wave of comments flooded social media after Bulgaria's dramatic elimination by Germany in the EuroVolley 2026 Round of 16. The disappointment from squandering a 2-0 game lead is immense, but despite the painful end, the majority of criticism is not directed at the young Bulgarian team, but at how the match was managed.
Most questions are directed at head coach Gianlorenzo Blengini. Many fans cannot accept that after the shift in the match's development, the Bulgarian bench found no way to stop the German comeback. Comments repeatedly mention late or insufficiently decisive substitutions, and some fans directly describe the defeat as a "coaching loss."
One of the most discussed topics is Denislav Bardarov. After his strong performance against Poland, fans are puzzled as to why the young outside hitter did not receive a more significant role against Germany. "Why did you take Bardarov out????" asks one fan, and the question is repeated in various forms in other reactions.
Fans also ask why Bardarov was not brought back into the game when the Bulgarian attack started to struggle. In the same context, Georgi Tatarov and Venislav Antov are mentioned as options who could have offered something different at moments when Germany had already changed the course of the match.
The other major topic is the serve. Not just the errors, but primarily the risk management of the serve. Discussions draw a comparison with the Germans' behavior, who, after their serving problems at the beginning, reduced the risk, while Bulgaria continued to seek maximum pressure.
Opinions are divided here. Some believe that a missed serve is an individual responsibility of the player and Blengini cannot perform the serve for him. Others are adamant that when errors accumulate, it is the coach who should change the task, reduce the risk, or use a substitution to break the negative streak.
Aleksandar Nikolov is also among the most discussed names, but a large part of the comments again point to the decisions of the bench. According to fans, when the main scorer was clearly not finding his usual rhythm, he could have been given a short break, and Bulgaria could have looked for other solutions in attack. The question is why the team continued to rely so heavily on Alex even at a moment when his game was not going well.
However, there are also people who defend Blengini. According to them, not all responsibility for the many individual errors on the court can be shifted to the coach. The discussions also recall the Italian's serious career as an argument against the most extreme assessments of his work.
Beyond purely volleyball questions, the topic of mentality clearly stands out. Some fans believe that the young Bulgarian team still plays more freely when it does not bear the burden of being an obligatory favorite. After the victory over Poland, expectations sharply increased, and at 2-0 against Germany, the quarter-final already seemed very close.
According to some fans, this is precisely one of the next lessons for this generation – to learn to win even when everyone already expects a victory from them. Youth and lack of sufficient experience in such situations are cited as one of the explanations for what happened after the magnificent first two games.
And this is precisely where the other strong line in fan reactions comes in – support for the team. "The boys are great, they gave everything," writes one fan. Such opinions show that even among those most disappointed by the loss, there is a clear distinction between criticism for the specific match and the assessment of this squad's future.
The comment of a Polish fan, who joined the discussion after Bulgaria's elimination, is also indicative: "You have a very young and promising team that plays good volleyball. It just lacked experience."
There are also much sharper reactions. In them, the criticism goes beyond the scope of the specific match and extends to the selection, the staff, and the work of the federation. However, some of these comments contain personal assessments and unverified claims, while the big question that unites the discussion remains far more specific – could Bulgaria have found another solution when Germany began its comeback?
Fans are disappointed. They ask about Bardarov, about the substitutions, about the serve, about the unused opportunities from the bench, and most of all about Blengini's reaction. But from the wave of comments, there is no feeling that people have lost faith in this team.
Quite the opposite. The pain of the defeat is so great precisely because the expectations for this young generation are already enormous. At 2-0 against Germany, the quarter-final seemed within reach. Bulgaria failed to reach it, and after the last point, many more questions remained about how this match was lost than about the team's future.